PRE/POST BQE

In Fall 2020, I was a fellow with the Institute for Public Architecture’s Fall Fellowship Residency: To Be or Not to BQE. The project begins to ask the question - can we meet the economic and social needs of humans while providing for a re-introduction of pre-colonial ecologies? 

Along with my teammate John Vogt, I envisioned the void left by the BQE filled by a reintroduced forest ecology informed by the ecologies that existed prior to the city’s development. However, the BQE passes through extremely diverse communities with vastly different needs and physical characteristics. The BQE’s physical relationship to the neighborhoods it passes through informs the development of different strategies for reintroducing human and natural ecologies after it is removed.

If it involves car-centric urbanism fucking up New York City, chances are this guy had something to do with it.

The task was to imagine what we could do if the BQE didn’t exist tomorrow. To do so, we started by looking back at what existed before the BQE. This ultimately took us back to long before Robert Moses.

We envisioned the development process moving in reverse in the wake of the BQE’s disappearance, with the initial condition being recognizably urban and the end condition being a strip of untamed wilderness running through Brooklyn. We explored this idea through a series of sketches and concept collages.

The study culminated in a conceptual framework for a post-BQE future.

The intervention proceeds in phases, gradually returning the BQE right-of-way to a wilder state.

We’re still thinking about it.

Previous
Previous

Reset: Towards a New Commons

Next
Next

Homestead